🔗 Share this article

Some Fortnite enthusiasts are feeling disappointed, and this isn't due to recent in-game happenings. The game's newest limited-time event, which brings a Simpsons-themed map, also unveiled a brand-new mechanic called pets. It's impossible to ignore that these latest pets are cute. However, the associated prices have made numerous fans stunned at this company's efforts to profit from almost each aspect of the gaming experience.

Understanding Companion Pets?

Sidekicks are basically similar to Pokémon, but with a few drawbacks. Players can name them, and these pets will accompany you during a match. They are immortal, and you can interact with them. Opposing gamers outside your party are unable to view these pets — and displaying one's animal friends is perhaps half the fun of owning them. Sidekicks can be outfitted with costumes and gestures, however the debate centers on their looks. A pet's main appearance can only be altered one time, after which that selection is final. You can select a sidekick's coat color, secondary colors, iris tones, pattern, and its body type.

A Expensive Customization Mechanism

Should you later choose that they'd like your sidekick to look a bit different, you cannot simply further modify the look. Players must buy a new companion. And, these pets aren't inexpensive. Most players are obtaining the Peels pet, because it is packaged with this season's battle pass. According to unofficial reports, upcoming pets could cost anywhere between 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; to put that in perspective, 1,000 V-Bucks costs $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks are $22.99. You can change the name of a companion whenever you'd like.

Community Response and Comparisons

The majority of sidekicks have not been officially launched yet, meaning the pricing may easily be adjusted. Yet regardless of whether the company makes companions more affordable, a lot of the frustration comes from the fact that gamers might need to pay for a single type of sidekick multiple times. For some, the pricing scheme feels particularly egregious considering the developer has already introduced companions that ride about as part of back blings. Back bling companions lack a restriction on changes and are visible by fellow players in the match. Backpack buddies cannot be given a name or use gestures, but other gamers are able to sometimes interact with them — which is more favorable than remaining invisible altogether.

The absence of unique functions and limited interaction options have many players experiencing disappointed. For instance, why is it not possible to you, for example, interact playfully with their fancy fruit-themed pet? A few point out that sidekicks do not always keep up with the user if a match is fast-paced, or observe that the banana pet occupies two slots in the battle pass — and this supports the notion that the company is pressuring players for revenue. Greedy is a word that's appearing frequently in these conversations, with some likening pet pricing to other intense monetization models in titles like EA Sports FC. It also adds to the issue that some sidekicks are projected to be more expensive than equivalent character skin versions.

"PLEASE avoid buy Companion Pets," urges a highly-voted community post that encourages other gamers to proverbially express disapproval by not spending.

"We understand they're adorable," the post continues, "I know they're enjoyable. We are aware we have all been looking forward to them. However the monetization focus on display is unacceptable and must not be supported."

The Bigger Context of Virtual Purchases

In recent years, Fortnite's special occasions and partnerships have expanded in scale and aspiration, yet the no-cost-to-start title still needs to earn revenue. Therefore, the total number of cosmetics users are able to now buy has grown almost overwhelming. In addition to standard items like back accessories, deployment tools, pickaxes, and gestures, you could potentially use money on shoes, songs, musical tools, building blocks, vehicles, wheels, custom paint jobs, seasonal rewards, and a membership. Companion pets do not just cost money, but also bring in a host of fresh monetization options for the developer. Presumably, users will before long be in a position to spend for things like pet looks, costumes, emotes, and additional engagement features.

Every one of these cosmetics are completely optional and not necessary to have fun with the experience, yet equipment can still affect your community interactions. Kids, for example, at times face bullying for not wearing flashy sufficiently cool skins. A similar situation previously transpired when the developer launched licensed shoes, which can range from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. The shoe cost model was not popular as well, and some players vowed that they'd avoid fall prey to the pressure at the time. However in the end, buying shoes became commonplace. Today, companion pets are further testing the limits of what a gamer might be prepared to pay to be distinctive within the crowd.

What is Ahead for Companion Pets?

Sidekicks are still a relatively new addition, and they're part of a title that updates frequently. A few fans are sharing that they've gotten a survey that gauges how the community feel about pet functionality and monetization, and this might possibly mean that the developer's strategy are remain subject to change. But if the game footwear are any indication, companions likely won't get cheaper in general — instead, there may be a wider selection of costs to shop.

After all, while some individuals are expressing anger at the game shop prices, different players are experiencing nothing but joy for their new battle royale friends.